Retelling Familiar Stories: What The Penelopiad's Chorus Teaches Student Writers

Retelling familiar stories from a minor character's perspective starts with one decision: choose someone who stood close to every key event but was never allowed to speak, then re-narrate those events through their eyes. Margaret Atwood's The Penelopiad, revived at York Theatre Royal, shows the move at full scale: while Penelope tells her side from Hades, her eight-strong chorus of slain maids interrupts with a bitter account of their own. For student writers, the lesson is practical. Give the silenced witness the facts only they could know, let them dispute the hero's version, and the old story turns new.

Why the maids' chorus changes the story

The craft lesson comes from a stage revival. A Guardian review of The Penelopiad at York Theatre Royal describes Margaret Atwood's adaptation of her own novella, with Amelia Bullmore as a wry Penelope narrating from Hades. In Sara Perks's minimal design, the underworld is a sterile, featureless place, drained of the passion and mess of life, with thick blood-red ropes suggesting both the strands Penelope wove and the cords used to hang her maids. Those wronged maids form an eight-strong chorus. They act out episodes from Penelope's life, and they interrupt with their own bitter take on events, so the same marriage, the same departure to Troy, and the same long years arrive twice, differently told.

Notice what the device does structurally. Penelope's version stays intact; the chorus does not replace it but shadows it, disputing it line by line. The reviewer frames this as a correction of attention, noting that Odysseus has hogged the spotlight all summer thanks to a blockbuster film take on Homer, and that the silenced maids finally get their say. For a writer, the mechanism is perspective control: you decide which details the protagonist's account contains, which details only the witness noticed, and where the two accounts collide. Dramatic irony then does quiet work in the reader's mind, because the audience holds both versions at once and weighs every heroic claim against the counter-voice whispering behind it.

Choosing the witness your story forgot

Our first exercise is a witness audit. Take a myth, fairy tale, or classic you know well and list five background characters who appear near the important scenes: servants, messengers, younger siblings, the innkeeper, the second soldier. For each, write three lines: what they saw, what they wanted, and why the story never let them speak. Then choose the one whose silence bothers you most. The strongest candidates are usually present at more than one turning point, dependent on the protagonist in some way, and holding one fact the plot never explains. A witness with a stake and a grievance will carry a retelling; a passive observer will only summarize it.

Once you have chosen, our second exercise builds the witness's inventory before you draft any narration. Write a page in which your chosen character simply lists what they witnessed, scene by scene, in plain notes: who entered the room, what was said within earshot, what was done offstage that the hero never mentions. Keep the protagonist's original events fixed; do not invent new plot turns yet. The goal is a factual base that makes the retelling feel earned rather than contrarian. When you finally re-narrate a key event, you will be selecting from real observed material, and the reader will sense the difference immediately.

Building a chorus that interrupts

The Penelopiad's most transferable device is interruption, and our third exercise rehearses it in miniature. Write one key scene twice. First, narrate it straight in the protagonist's voice, about three hundred words, played fairly. Then write four short chorus interjections of two or three sentences each, spoken by your witness or a collective of witnesses, each one placed at a different point in the scene and each one disputing, correcting, or bitterly reframing what the protagonist just said. Read the two layers interleaved. You are now controlling rhythm: how long the main voice runs before the counter-voice cuts in, and how much damage each cut does.

A collective voice needs a distinct register, which is what our fourth exercise trains. Give your chorus a shared manner of speaking: a repeated refrain, a counting habit, a way of addressing the protagonist directly, or a flat tone that contrasts with the hero's eloquence. In the reviewed production, the maids both perform episodes of Penelope's life and step out of them to comment, so practise that double role too: your chorus can briefly embody a scene, then break it to give their own account. Draft the interruptions separately from the main text, then decide their placement last, so the dispute lands at the moments of highest tension.

From exercise to finished retelling

Revision is where the retelling becomes a story rather than a stunt. Reread your draft and check three balances: the protagonist's version must remain convincing enough that the dispute matters, the witness's version must contain at least one detail that permanently changes how the reader reads the original, and the interruptions must escalate rather than repeat. Cut any chorus line that only agrees with the main account; disagreement is the engine. Then tighten the seams, deciding whether your piece reads as a monologue with intrusions, a dialogue between versions, or a full chorus script, and let that chosen form govern your final line breaks and pacing.

When your retelling is ready to leave your notebook, treat it as you would any submission. If you are entering work like this to a student competition such as CWA, remember the ground rules: entry is free, AI assistance must be clearly disclosed, and the submission must primarily reflect your own creative contribution, with feedback delivered privately after processing. That disclosure rule protects exactly what this exercise builds, a perspective that is genuinely yours. Choose a story you love enough to argue with, hand the microphone to the person it silenced, and let the interruption begin.

Sources